Embedded Files
Storyline 360 Concept
A Storyline 360 concept simulation designed to help frontline staff practise confident, consistent complaint responses.
Project Details
Project Details
Title: Effective Complaint Handling
Project Type: Concept project — a fictional scenario built to demonstrate design process, not a client engagement.
Format: Branching scenario simulation
Duration: About 15 minutes (self-paced)
Role: Instructional designer, scenario writer, storyboard author
Tools Used: Articulate Storyline 360, Canva, Google Slides
Skills Applied: Branching scenario design, action mapping, stakeholder analysis, feedback-driven learning design
Target Audience: Front-line customer service staff in quick-service environments
The Design Process
The Design Process
The Challenge
The Challenge
Identified a recurring service problem. Customers escalated more complaints than necessary because responses varied widely from one frontline employee to the next.
Frontline staff often escalated issues because empathy, listening, and resolution steps were applied inconsistently.
I reviewed customer-service best practices and used a simulated stakeholder brief to shape realistic scenarios.
I built an action map linking each practice activity to proposed business goals: fewer escalations and more consistent responses.
I then created a design document and storyboard to guide structure, branching, and feedback.
The Solution
The Solution
I structured the course as a branching scenario.
I used click to reveal empathy tasks to strengthen listening.
I added drag and drop steps to reinforce the process.
I placed feedback at each decision point to show why a choice worked or failed.
I included a completion certificate to recognise effort and skill growth.
Intended Outcomes
Intended Outcomes
Improve accuracy when recognising complaint types in practice.
Increase staff confidence when handling complaints.
Strengthen empathy and listening during customer interactions.
Reduce escalations in simulated complaint scenarios.
Improve consistency in how staff apply the resolution process.
Design Rationale
Design Rationale
Scenario-based practice was chosen to make abstract service principles easier to apply.
Decision-point feedback was used to explain why each response was effective or ineffective.
Repeated practice was included to support confidence and consistency.
Simple interaction patterns were used to keep attention on skill application.
Lessons Learned
Lessons Learned
Realistic decisions are more useful than explaining service principles alone. Learners need to practise choosing a response under pressure.
Feedback works best when it shows the likely effect of each choice on the customer, employee, and organization.
Each decision should focus on a clear skill, such as active listening, empathy, problem-solving, or escalation.
Simple interactions keep attention on the conversation. Extra drag-and-drop or click-to-reveal activities should only remain when they support the performance objective.
Branching needs meaningful consequences. Different choices should affect the conversation instead of returning learners to the same path.
A live pilot would be needed to confirm the scenario's realism, difficulty, accessibility, and effect on performance.
Finished Project
Finished Project
This project moved from a real service problem to a working, testable training simulation.
This concept project demonstrates my process for translating a service problem into an action map, branching storyboard, feedback strategy, and interactive Storyline prototype.
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse